ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
efd4f31ba3
TenantAtlas/specs/192-record-header-discipline/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 9f6985291e feat: implement spec 192 record page header discipline (#226) 
## Summary
- implement Spec 192 across the targeted Filament record, detail, and edit pages with explicit action-surface inventory and guard coverage
- add the focused Spec 192 browser smoke, feature tests, and spec artifacts under `specs/192-record-header-discipline`
- improve unhandled promise rejection diagnostics by correlating 419s to the underlying Livewire request URL
- disable panel-wide database notification polling on the admin, tenant, and system panels and cover the mitigation with focused tests

## Validation
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/DatabaseNotificationsPollingTest.php`
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/DatabaseNotificationsPollingTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/UnhandledRejectionLoggerAssetTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/FilamentNotificationsAssetsTest.php tests/Feature/Workspaces/ManagedTenantsLivewireUpdateTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/AdminSmokeTest.php`
- `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`
- manual integrated-browser verification of the Spec 192 surfaces and the notification-polling mitigation

## Notes
- Livewire v4 / Filament v5 compliance remains unchanged.
- Provider registration stays in `bootstrap/providers.php`.
- No Global Search behavior was expanded.
- No destructive action confirmation semantics were relaxed.
- The full test suite was not run in this PR.

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #226
2026-04-11 21:20:41 +00:00

1.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Record Page Header Discipline & Contextual Navigation

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-11
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validated on first pass against the completed spec.
  • No clarification markers remain.
  • The spec keeps the cleanup bounded to classic record/detail/edit surfaces and documents the tenant admin resource view as the only explicit special-type exception.