ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
f08924525d
TenantAtlas/specs/117-baseline-drift-engine/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido f08924525d Spec 117: Baseline Drift Engine + evidence fidelity/provenance (#142) 
Implements Spec 117 (Golden Master Baseline Drift Engine):

- Adds provider-chain resolver for current state hashes (content evidence via PolicyVersion, meta evidence via inventory)
- Updates baseline capture + compare jobs to use resolver and persist provenance + fidelity
- Adds evidence_fidelity column/index + Filament UI badge/filter/provenance display for findings
- Adds performance guard test + integration tests for drift, fidelity semantics, provenance, filter behavior
- UX fix: Policies list shows "Sync from Intune" header action only when records exist; empty-state CTA remains and is functional

Tests:
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/PolicySyncCtaPlacementTest.php`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact --filter=Baseline`

Checklist:
- specs/117-baseline-drift-engine/checklists/requirements.md ✓

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #142
2026-03-03 07:23:01 +00:00

1.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Spec 117 — Golden Master Baseline Drift

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-03-02 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Items marked incomplete require spec updates before /speckit.clarify or /speckit.plan

  • Remaining technical terms (e.g., “hash”, “provider chain”, “fidelity”) are treated as product-domain vocabulary required to specify deterministic drift behavior, not as framework/API implementation instructions.