ahmido
f1a73490e4
## Summary - add a dedicated Recovery Readiness dashboard widget for backup posture and recovery evidence - group Needs Attention items by domain and elevate the recovery call-to-action - align restore-run and recovery posture tests with the extracted widget and continuity flows - include the related spec artifacts for 184-dashboard-recovery-honesty ## Verification - `cd /Users/ahmeddarrazi/Documents/projects/TenantAtlas/apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `cd /Users/ahmeddarrazi/Documents/projects/TenantAtlas/apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact --filter="DashboardKpisWidget|DashboardRecoveryPosture|TenantDashboardDbOnly|TenantpilotSeedBackupHealthBrowserFixtureCommand|NeedsAttentionWidget"` - browser smoke verified on the calm, unvalidated, and weakened dashboard states ## Notes - Livewire v4.0+ compliant with Filament v5 - no panel provider changes; Laravel 11+ provider registration remains in `bootstrap/providers.php` - Recovery Readiness stays within the existing tenant dashboard asset strategy; no new Filament asset registration required Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #215
34 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
34 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Dashboard Recovery Posture Honesty
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-08
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validated on 2026-04-08. The spec keeps behavior focused on dashboard honesty, restore-history evidence, and operator trust boundaries. Repository-specific route and surface references are retained only where this template and constitution require concrete scope identification. |