## Summary - add the Spec 180 tenant backup-health resolver and value objects to derive absent, stale, degraded, healthy, and schedule-follow-up posture from existing backup and schedule truth - surface backup posture and reason-driven drillthroughs in the tenant dashboard and preserve continuity on backup-set and backup-schedule destinations - add deterministic local/testing browser-fixture seeding plus a local fixture-login helper for the blocked drillthrough `403` scenario, along with the related spec artifacts and focused regression coverage ## Testing - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Auth/BackupHealthBrowserFixtureLoginTest.php tests/Feature/Console/TenantpilotSeedBackupHealthBrowserFixtureCommandTest.php` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Unit/Support/BackupHealth/TenantBackupHealthResolverTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/DashboardKpisWidgetTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/NeedsAttentionWidgetTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/TenantDashboardTruthAlignmentTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/TenantDashboardTenantScopeTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/TenantDashboardDbOnlyTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BackupSetListContinuityTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BackupSetEnterpriseDetailPageTest.php tests/Feature/BackupScheduling/BackupScheduleLifecycleTest.php tests/Feature/Auth/BackupHealthBrowserFixtureLoginTest.php tests/Feature/Console/TenantpilotSeedBackupHealthBrowserFixtureCommandTest.php` ## Notes - Filament v5 / Livewire v4 compliant; no panel-provider change was needed, so `bootstrap/providers.php` remains unchanged - no new globally searchable resource was introduced, so global-search behavior is unchanged - no new destructive action was added; existing destructive actions and confirmation behavior remain unchanged - no new asset registration was added; the existing deploy-time `php artisan filament:assets` step remains sufficient - the local fixture login helper route is limited to `local` and `testing` environments - the focused and broader Spec 180 packs are green; the full suite was not rerun after these changes Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #212
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Tenant Backup Health Signals
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-07
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validated on 2026-04-07 against the completed Spec 180 draft.
|
|
- No clarification markers remain.
|
|
- The spec stays bounded to tenant backup-health truth on dashboard and follow-up surfaces and does not expand into recovery-confidence or new persistence. |