ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
f1eadadf78
TenantAtlas/specs/375-ui-bloat-regression-guard/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 8efc8981a4 feat(guard): implement ui bloat regression guard (#446) 
Added UiBloatRegressionGuardTest to enforce known UI bloat and customer/auditor safety regression patterns across configured runtime UI source paths as defined in Spec 375.

Registered the test in Pest.php and added to TestLaneManifest.

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #446
2026-06-13 09:03:36 +00:00

3.0 KiB
Raw Blame History

Requirements Checklist: Spec 375 - UI Bloat Regression Guard v1

Purpose: Validate preparation readiness for Spec 375 before implementation. Created: 2026-06-13 Feature: specs/375-ui-bloat-regression-guard/spec.md

Spec Quality

  • CHK001 The selected candidate is directly provided by the user as Spec 375 and aligned with the recent Spec 370-374 UI productization sequence.
  • CHK002 The completed-spec guardrail treats Specs 370-374 as completed context only and does not reopen or rewrite their history.
  • CHK003 The spec states the concrete trust/workflow problem: future UI changes can regress into bloat, unsafe customer/auditor copy, or unclear diagnostic entrypoints without early guard feedback.
  • CHK004 The spec defines the smallest enterprise-capable slice: one static guard/scanner entrypoint with warn-first behavior, allowlist policy, and initial report.
  • CHK005 Functional requirements are testable and avoid requiring a broad page refactor.
  • CHK006 Out-of-scope boundaries exclude runtime UI refactors, migrations, models, routes, Filament page/resource changes, browser screenshot infra, and visual regression.
  • CHK007 Risks, assumptions, and non-blocking open questions are recorded.

Constitution And Guardrails

  • CHK008 UI Surface Impact is completed as No UI surface impact with rationale.
  • CHK009 Cross-cutting shared pattern reuse names existing guard/test/script conventions and avoids a runtime UI framework.
  • CHK010 OperationRun UX impact states no OperationRun behavior is touched.
  • CHK011 Provider boundary treatment keeps provider terms as scanner leakage indicators, not platform-core truth.
  • CHK012 Proportionality review justifies the narrow guard and rejects browser visual regression and manual-only review.
  • CHK013 RBAC, workspace/tenant isolation, auditability, and data minimization are addressed as no-runtime-impact constraints.
  • CHK014 Test governance names surface-guard / heavy-governance ownership and forbids hidden browser/DB fixture cost.
  • CHK015 Filament v5 / Livewire v4 compliance, provider registration, global search, destructive action, asset, and testing posture are stated in the plan.

Task Readiness

  • CHK016 tasks.md includes repo-truth and source-input tasks before tooling edits.
  • CHK017 tasks.md includes spec-local artifact tasks before implementation.
  • CHK018 tasks.md includes tests before scanner implementation.
  • CHK019 tasks.md includes initial scan, allowlist, validation, and close-out artifact tasks.
  • CHK020 tasks.md includes explicit non-goals to prevent runtime UI refactor creep.

Preparation Outcome

  • CHK021 Candidate Selection Gate result: pass.
  • CHK022 Spec Readiness Gate result: pass for preparation.
  • CHK023 Review outcome class: acceptable-special-case.
  • CHK024 Workflow outcome: keep.

Notes

This checklist validates preparation only. It does not claim scanner implementation, initial scan execution, test execution, CI integration, or runtime UI changes.