TenantAtlas/specs/377-post-productization-browser-reaudit-closeout-gate/checklists/requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Spec 377 - Post-Productization Browser Re-Audit and Closeout Gate v1

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before implementation planning closeout Created: 2026-06-13 Feature: specs/377-post-productization-browser-reaudit-closeout-gate/spec.md

Content Quality

• No application implementation details are required to understand the product outcome.
• Focused on user value and business needs.
• Written for product/review stakeholders as well as implementers.
• All mandatory sections completed.

Requirement Completeness

• No unresolved clarification markers remain.
• Requirements are testable and unambiguous.
• Success criteria are measurable.
• Success criteria are technology-agnostic where possible and command-specific only where validation requires it.
• All acceptance scenarios are defined.
• Edge cases are identified.
• Scope is clearly bounded.
• Dependencies and assumptions identified.

Feature Readiness

• All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria.
• User scenarios cover primary flows.
• Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria.
• Implementation scope is limited to Spec Kit artifacts and audit evidence.

Constitution And Guardrail Checks

• SPEC-GATE-001 candidate check is complete and scores at least 7/12.
• UI-COV-001 decision is explicit: no reachable UI surface impact, audit-only evidence package.
• TEST-GOV-001 lane and browser/heavy-governance cost are explicit.
• Completed-spec guardrail is explicit for Specs 368 and 370-376.
• Proportionality review explains why spec-local audit artifacts are the narrowest durable closeout proof.
• OperationRun, Provider Boundary, Filament Action Matrix, RBAC, and deployment impacts are marked N/A or no-change where appropriate.
• Final validation tasks include screenshot/artifact redaction review for secrets, credentials, tokens, and sensitive provider payloads.
• Final validation tasks include cross-artifact verification-class review for generated Markdown and CSV claims.
• Final validation tasks include a complete changed-files boundary check, not only runtime-file status.
• No application implementation is required by the preparation artifacts.

Readiness Outcome

• Review outcome class: acceptable-special-case.
• Workflow outcome: keep.
• Notes: Ready for implementation-loop execution as an audit/reporting spec. The later implementation must stop if it needs runtime code changes and update spec.md/plan.md before continuing.