ahmido
37c6d0622c
## Summary - implement the Action Surface Contract v1.1 runtime changes for Spec 169 - add the new explicit ActionSurfaceType contract, validator/discovery updates, and enrolled surface declarations - update Filament action-surface documentation, focused guard tests, and spec artifacts for the completed feature ## Included - clickable-row vs explicit-inspect enforcement across monitoring, reporting, CRUD, and system reference surfaces - helper-first, workflow-next, destructive-last overflow ordering checks - system panel list discovery in the primary action-surface validator - Spec 169 artifacts: spec, plan, tasks, research, data model, quickstart, and logical contract ## Verification - focused Pest verification pack completed for: - tests/Feature/Guards/ActionSurfaceValidatorTest.php - tests/Feature/Guards/ActionSurfaceContractTest.php - tests/Feature/Rbac/TenantActionSurfaceConsistencyTest.php - integrated browser smoke test completed for admin-side reference surfaces: - /admin/operations - /admin/audit-log - /admin/finding-exceptions/queue - /admin/reviews - /admin/tenants ## Notes - system panel browser smoke coverage could not be exercised in the same session because /system routes require platform authentication in the integrated browser - Livewire target remains v4-compliant and no provider registration or asset strategy changes are introduced by this PR Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #200
1.4 KiB
1.4 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Action Surface Contract v1.1: Inspect Decision Rules, Menu Ordering, and Behavior Guard Coverage
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-30
Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- Validated against the active Spec Kit template, constitution retrofit priorities, and current repository state.
- System-panel enrollment and relation-manager rollout work were treated as completed current-state evidence, so this spec stays bounded to the remaining foundation-and-enforcement gap.