ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
fdd3a85b64
TenantAtlas/specs/170-system-operations-surface-alignment/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido fdd3a85b64 feat: align system operations surfaces (#201) 
## Summary
- align the system-panel Operations, Failed operations, and Stuck operations pages to the read-only registry contract by removing inline row triage and keeping row-click inspection
- keep retry, cancel, and mark-investigated behavior on the canonical system operation detail page while adding the explicit `Show all operations` return path and updated `Operations / Operation` copy
- add and update focused Pest and Livewire coverage for list CTA behavior, detail-owned triage, and view-only versus manage-capable platform access
- add Spec 170 implementation artifacts plus the follow-on Spec 171 and Spec 172 packages

## Testing
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/System/Spec114/OpsTriageActionsTest.php`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Guards/ActionSurfaceContractTest.php`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/System/Spec114/OpsFailuresViewTest.php`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/System/Spec114/OpsStuckViewTest.php`
- integrated browser smoke on `/system/ops/runs`, `/system/ops/failures`, `/system/ops/stuck`, empty states via search filter, and detail-page retry confirmation visibility

## Notes
- branch pushed from `170-system-operations-surface-alignment`
- latest commit: `64b4d741 feat: align system operations surfaces`

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #201
2026-03-30 19:08:56 +00:00

1.2 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: System Operations Surface Alignment

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-03-30 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation pass 1: complete
  • This spec intentionally excludes naming consolidation and deferred dashboard or onboarding retrofits, which are reserved for Specs 171 and 172.