ahmido
fdd3a85b64
## Summary - align the system-panel Operations, Failed operations, and Stuck operations pages to the read-only registry contract by removing inline row triage and keeping row-click inspection - keep retry, cancel, and mark-investigated behavior on the canonical system operation detail page while adding the explicit `Show all operations` return path and updated `Operations / Operation` copy - add and update focused Pest and Livewire coverage for list CTA behavior, detail-owned triage, and view-only versus manage-capable platform access - add Spec 170 implementation artifacts plus the follow-on Spec 171 and Spec 172 packages ## Testing - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/System/Spec114/OpsTriageActionsTest.php` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Guards/ActionSurfaceContractTest.php` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/System/Spec114/OpsFailuresViewTest.php` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/System/Spec114/OpsStuckViewTest.php` - integrated browser smoke on `/system/ops/runs`, `/system/ops/failures`, `/system/ops/stuck`, empty states via search filter, and detail-page retry confirmation visibility ## Notes - branch pushed from `170-system-operations-surface-alignment` - latest commit: `64b4d741 feat: align system operations surfaces` Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #201
35 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Operations Naming Consolidation
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-30
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation pass 1: complete
|
|
- This spec intentionally starts after Spec 170 and is limited to residual operator-visible naming drift outside the already-aligned system operations surfaces. |