TenantAtlas/specs/413-focused-pilot-gate-recheck/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido fdd9eb2e82 feat: add focused pilot gate recheck (#480)
Automated PR provided by Codex via Gitea API.

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #480
2026-06-24 23:02:06 +00:00

4.8 KiB

Requirements Checklist: Spec 413 - Focused Pilot Gate Recheck

Purpose: Preparation readiness checklist for a read-only focused pilot gate recheck after Spec 412. Feature: specs/413-focused-pilot-gate-recheck/ Created: 2026-06-24

Applicability And Low-Impact Gate

  • The selected candidate was directly provided by the operator as Spec 413.
  • The active candidate queue in docs/product/spec-candidates.md was checked and has no automatic next-best-prep target.
  • Manual promotion is justified by the supplied candidate and the Spec 407 -> Spec 412 -> Spec 413 sequence.
  • No existing specs/413-focused-pilot-gate-recheck/ package existed before this prep.
  • Related completed context was checked: Spec 407 is read-only audit context and Spec 412 contains completed tasks/implementation report.
  • Completed specs are preserved and not rewritten.
  • The scope is read-only and focused, not a full browser audit.
  • No application implementation or test-file change is planned or allowed.

Product Surface Contract

  • Product Surface Contract is referenced as the evaluation lens.
  • Product Surface Impact records N/A - no rendered product surface changed.
  • Browser proof is required because the future gate output is browser/runtime evidence.
  • Human Product Sanity is planned for the final gate report.
  • Product Surface exceptions are none for preparation.
  • Final report requirements include Livewire v4 compliance, provider registration location, global search posture, destructive/high-impact action posture, asset strategy, tests/browser result, deployment impact, visible complexity outcome, and completed-spec rewrite assertion.

Scope And Requirements

  • The problem statement is clear: verify whether Spec 412 actually closed Spec 407 pilot-readiness blockers.
  • User value is clear: provide PASS, PASS WITH CONDITIONS, or FAIL before Spec 414 controlled pilot preparation.
  • Functional requirements cover management PDF surfacing, report/PDF state agreement, signed/unsigned report behavior, OperationRun load, finding hash demotion, readonly provider no-access, focused regression checks, and final report structure.
  • Out-of-scope boundaries forbid fixes, tests, migrations, runtime data mutation, full audit, new surfaces, and completed-spec rewrites.
  • Acceptance criteria and success criteria are measurable.
  • Assumptions and risks are explicit.
  • No open question blocks safe read-only gate execution.

RBAC, Isolation, Auditability, And Truth Semantics

  • Workspace and managed-environment entitlement checks are included.
  • Unauthorized and cross-workspace report/PDF probes are included.
  • Signed/unsigned report boundaries are included.
  • OperationRun authorization checks are included.
  • Provider readonly and authorized comparison checks are included.
  • Customer-safe output and internal technical detail demotion are included.
  • Report/PDF artifact truth, execution truth, customer-safe truth, and provider boundary truth are distinguished.
  • No audit log writes or runtime mutations are introduced.

Tasks Quality

  • tasks.md exists.
  • Tasks are ordered by execution phase.
  • Tasks are small and verifiable.
  • Tasks include baseline/dirty-state capture.
  • Tasks include Spec 412 implementation-report inspection.
  • Tasks include route/fixture probe before browser work.
  • Tasks include required matrices and final gate decision.
  • Tasks include no-implementation and no-completed-spec-rewrite assertions.
  • Tasks do not require application code, tests, migrations, seeders, factories, routes, policies, views, config, assets, or runtime data changes.

Test Governance

  • Test purpose is classified as Browser/read-only audit evidence.
  • No new or modified tests or test family are planned.
  • Existing tests may be run only as validation commands with exact results.
  • Fixture/helper/factory/seed cost remains none.
  • Browser proof is focused and does not claim full browser audit coverage.
  • Missing fixtures or actors must be recorded as limitations, not pass evidence.

Review Outcome

  • Outcome class: acceptable-special-case.
  • Workflow outcome: keep.
  • Reason: The package is a bounded read-only gate after a completed remediation spec, with no runtime changes and explicit completed-spec protections.

Candidate Selection Gate

PASS. The candidate is directly provided, not already covered by an active/completed Spec 413 package, aligned with the roadmap path toward controlled pilot preparation, scoped as a small focused gate, and preserves Spec 407/412 history.

Spec Readiness Gate

PASS FOR IMPLEMENTATION PREPARATION. spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, and this checklist exist and are aligned for a later read-only gate execution.