TenantAtlas/specs/043-cross-tenant-compare-and-promotion/checklists/requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Cross-Tenant Compare Preview and Promotion Preflight

Purpose: Validate full preparation-package completeness and implementation readiness before the feature moves into the implementation loop
Created: 2026-04-27
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

• Business value and operator outcome stay explicit
• The slice is tightly bounded to compare preview, promotion preflight, and portfolio launch continuity
• Runtime-governance sections are present for an implementation-ready package
• All mandatory sections are completed in spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md

Requirement Completeness

• No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
• Requirements are testable and unambiguous
• Acceptance scenarios are defined for compare preview, read-only promotion preflight, and launch/return continuity
• Edge cases are identified, including explicit rejection of same-tenant compare, cross-workspace attempts, lost entitlement, ambiguous identity, and stale target evidence
• Scope is clearly bounded away from actual promotion execution, queues, persisted drafts, mapping automation, customer-facing compare, and multi-provider work
• Dependencies, assumptions, risks, and follow-up candidates are identified

Feature Readiness

• The first slice is small enough for a bounded implementation loop
• Concrete repo surfaces are named for compare reuse, portfolio launch, audit reuse, and likely new compare support files
• Foundational work stays preparation-only and does not imply execution scope or new persistence
• The tasks are ordered, testable, and grouped by user story
• No unresolved product question blocks implementation once artifact analysis passes

Governance Readiness

• Workspace and tenant isolation rules are explicit, including 404 for non-members and out-of-scope tenants
• The capability matrix is explicit: page access = WORKSPACE_BASELINES_VIEW, preview data = TENANT_VIEW on both tenants, preflight execution = WORKSPACE_BASELINES_MANAGE, and manage-denied members see a disabled preflight action with permission guidance
• Promotion remains preflight-only, with no write execution, queue, or OperationRun
• Audit remains bounded to promotion-preflight entry points with no new compare/promotion persistence truth
• Livewire v4 and Filament v5 compliance, unchanged provider registration in bootstrap/providers.php, no new global-search resource, and no new asset strategy are explicit in the package

Test Governance Review

• Lane fit stays in focused Unit plus Feature validation only
• Fixture and helper growth stays local to compare preview, preflight classification, and launch-context coverage
• No browser, heavy-governance, or queue family is introduced implicitly
• Minimal validation commands are explicit in the plan
• The active feature PR close-out entry remains Guardrail

Review Outcome

• Review outcome class: keep
• Workflow outcome: keep
• Next command readiness: implementation prep is ready once artifact analysis is clear

Notes

• This checklist validates the preparation package only: spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, and this checklist artifact. It does not claim that runtime code or a promotion workflow already exists.
• The active slice stops before any target mutation, any queued execution, any persisted draft or compare snapshot, and any broader mapping automation.
• No new globally searchable resource is introduced, no new asset registration is expected, and deployment behavior remains unchanged unless a later implementation explicitly adds assets.