ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
ff671d8d4a
TenantAtlas/specs/078-operations-tenantless-canonical/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido d56ba85755 Spec 078: Operations tenantless canonical detail (#95) 
Implements Spec 078 operations tenantless canonical migration.

Highlights:
- Canonical run detail at `/admin/operations/{run}` renders with standard Filament chrome + sidebar and reuses `OperationRunResource::infolist()` (schema-based, Filament v5).
- Legacy tenant-scoped resource pages removed; legacy URLs return 404 as required.
- Added full spec test pack under `tests/Feature/078/` and updated existing tests.
- Added safe refresh/header actions wiring and KPI header guard when tenant context is null.

Validation:
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/078/` (pass)
- `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty` (pass)

Notes:
- Livewire v4+ compliant (Filament v5).
- Panel providers remain registered in `bootstrap/providers.php` (Laravel 11+ standard).

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmeddarrazi@MacBookPro.fritz.box>
Reviewed-on: #95
2026-02-07 09:07:26 +00:00

2.6 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Operations Tenantless Canonical Migration

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-02-06
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) — Implementation Notes section is clearly marked non-normative; FR-078-002 mentions trait names as implementation guidance only
  • Focused on user value and business needs — all user stories describe user outcomes, not system internals
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders — principles and requirements use domain language
  • All mandatory sections completed — User Scenarios, Requirements, Success Criteria all present

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain — all decisions resolved (302 vs 301, KPI deferral, infolist approach)
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous — each FR has specific verifiable behavior
  • Success criteria are measurable — SC-001 through SC-006 all have concrete pass/fail conditions
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details) — criteria reference URLs and user outcomes, not code
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined — 4 user stories with given/when/then scenarios
  • Edge cases are identified — 5 edge cases documented including null workspace, non-numeric record, null tenant
  • Scope is clearly bounded — Non-Goals section explicitly excludes KPI workspace-scoping, alerts engine, capability-gating
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified — baseline routes, existing link helpers, constitution alignment documented

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria — FR-078-001 through FR-078-012 each specify observable behavior
  • User scenarios cover primary flows — canonical view, legacy redirects, contextual nav, list regression
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria — SC-001 (one canonical URL), SC-003 (secure redirects), SC-005 (verification report tenantless)
  • No implementation details leak into specification — Implementation Notes section is non-normative; core spec is behavior-focused

Notes

  • FR-078-002 includes implementation guidance (trait names) as a non-normative hint for planners; the normative requirement is "reuse infolist schema" regardless of approach.
  • Open decision on 301 vs 302 documented; 302 chosen as Phase 1 default with clear promotion path.
  • KPI workspace-scoping explicitly deferred (Non-Goals + FR-078-008) — keeps migration scope focused.