ahmido
1fec9c6f9d
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 45s
## Summary - introduce surface-aware compressed governance outcomes and reuse the shared truth/explanation seams for operator-first summaries - apply the compressed outcome hierarchy across baseline, evidence, review, review-pack, canonical review/evidence, and artifact-oriented operation-run surfaces - expand spec 214 fixtures and Pest coverage, and fix tenant-panel route assertions by generating explicit tenant-panel URLs in the affected Filament tests ## Validation - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - focused governance compression suite from `specs/214-governance-outcome-compression/quickstart.md` passed (`68` tests, `445` assertions) - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/InventoryItemResourceTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BackupSetUiEnforcementTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/RestoreRunUiEnforcementTest.php` passed (`18` tests, `81` assertions) Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #253
36 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Governance Operator Outcome Compression
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-19
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- No `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers remain in the spec.
|
|
- The spec stays bounded to adoption of existing governance truth and explanation foundations across listed artifact surfaces.
|
|
- Repo-required surface matrices identify existing affected surfaces without introducing new implementation decisions or dependency changes. |