ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
dev
TenantAtlas/specs/122-empty-state-consistency/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 73a3a62451 Spec 122: Empty state consistency pass (#148) 
## Summary
- unify empty-state UX across the six in-scope Filament list pages
- move empty-state ownership toward resource `table()` definitions while preserving existing RBAC behavior
- add focused Pest coverage for empty-state rendering, CTA outcomes, populated-state regression behavior, and action-surface compliance
- add the Spec 122 planning artifacts and product discovery documents used for this pass

## Changed surfaces
- `PolicyResource`
- `BackupSetResource`
- `RestoreRunResource`
- `BackupScheduleResource`
- `WorkspaceResource`
- `AlertDeliveryResource`

## Tests
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/EmptyStateConsistencyTest.php`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/Alerts/AlertDeliveryViewerTest.php`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/CreateCtaPlacementTest.php`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/PolicySyncStartSurfaceTest.php`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/BackupScheduling/BackupScheduleLifecycleAuthorizationTest.php`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/BackupSetUiEnforcementTest.php`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/RestoreRunUiEnforcementTest.php`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Guards/ActionSurfaceContractTest.php`
- `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`

## Notes
- Filament v5 / Livewire v4.0+ compliance is preserved.
- Panel provider registration remains unchanged in `bootstrap/providers.php`.
- No new globally searchable resources were added.
- Destructive actions were not introduced by this pass.
- Alert Deliveries is documented as the explicit no-header-action exemption for the empty-state CTA relocation rule.
- Manual light/dark visual QA evidence is still expected in the PR/review artifact set for the remaining checklist items (`T018`, `T025`).

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #148
2026-03-08 02:17:51 +00:00

1.3 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Empty State Consistency Pass

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-08
Feature: specs/122-empty-state-consistency/spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • This spec includes the required UI Action Matrix per the project constitution, but avoids code-level steps and avoids prescribing specific implementation mechanisms beyond the user-visible UX contract.
  • Ready for /speckit.plan.