ahmido
73a3a62451
## Summary - unify empty-state UX across the six in-scope Filament list pages - move empty-state ownership toward resource `table()` definitions while preserving existing RBAC behavior - add focused Pest coverage for empty-state rendering, CTA outcomes, populated-state regression behavior, and action-surface compliance - add the Spec 122 planning artifacts and product discovery documents used for this pass ## Changed surfaces - `PolicyResource` - `BackupSetResource` - `RestoreRunResource` - `BackupScheduleResource` - `WorkspaceResource` - `AlertDeliveryResource` ## Tests - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/EmptyStateConsistencyTest.php` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/Alerts/AlertDeliveryViewerTest.php` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/CreateCtaPlacementTest.php` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/PolicySyncStartSurfaceTest.php` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/BackupScheduling/BackupScheduleLifecycleAuthorizationTest.php` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/BackupSetUiEnforcementTest.php` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/RestoreRunUiEnforcementTest.php` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Guards/ActionSurfaceContractTest.php` - `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` ## Notes - Filament v5 / Livewire v4.0+ compliance is preserved. - Panel provider registration remains unchanged in `bootstrap/providers.php`. - No new globally searchable resources were added. - Destructive actions were not introduced by this pass. - Alert Deliveries is documented as the explicit no-header-action exemption for the empty-state CTA relocation rule. - Manual light/dark visual QA evidence is still expected in the PR/review artifact set for the remaining checklist items (`T018`, `T025`). Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #148
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Empty State Consistency Pass
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-08
|
|
**Feature**: [specs/122-empty-state-consistency/spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- This spec includes the required UI Action Matrix per the project constitution, but avoids code-level steps and avoids prescribing specific implementation mechanisms beyond the user-visible UX contract.
|
|
- Ready for `/speckit.plan`.
|