ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
dev
TenantAtlas/specs/134-audit-log-foundation/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 28cfe38ba4 feat: lay audit log foundation (#163) 
## Summary
- turn the Monitoring audit log placeholder into a real workspace-scoped audit review surface
- introduce a shared audit recorder, richer audit value objects, and additive audit log schema evolution
- add audit outcome and actor badges, permission-aware related navigation, and durable audit retention coverage

## Included
- canonical `/admin/audit-log` list and detail inspection UI
- audit model helpers, taxonomy expansion, actor/target snapshots, and recorder/builder services
- operation terminal audit writes and purge command retention changes
- spec 134 design artifacts and focused Pest coverage for audit foundation behavior

## Validation
- `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Unit/Audit tests/Unit/Badges/AuditBadgesTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/AuditLogPageTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/AuditLogDetailInspectionTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/AuditLogAuthorizationTest.php tests/Feature/Monitoring/AuditCoverageGovernanceTest.php tests/Feature/Monitoring/AuditCoverageOperationsTest.php tests/Feature/Console/TenantpilotPurgeNonPersistentDataTest.php`

## Notes
- Livewire v4.0+ compliance is preserved within the existing Filament v5 application.
- No provider registration changes were needed; panel provider registration remains in `bootstrap/providers.php`.
- No new globally searchable resource was introduced.
- The audit page remains read-only; no destructive actions were added.
- No new asset pipeline changes were introduced; existing deploy-time `php artisan filament:assets` behavior remains unchanged.

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #163
2026-03-11 09:39:37 +00:00

1.3 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Audit Log Foundation

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-11
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation pass 1: passed. The spec stays product-facing while still naming the existing canonical audit route and capability required by current repo conventions.