ahmido
28cfe38ba4
## Summary - turn the Monitoring audit log placeholder into a real workspace-scoped audit review surface - introduce a shared audit recorder, richer audit value objects, and additive audit log schema evolution - add audit outcome and actor badges, permission-aware related navigation, and durable audit retention coverage ## Included - canonical `/admin/audit-log` list and detail inspection UI - audit model helpers, taxonomy expansion, actor/target snapshots, and recorder/builder services - operation terminal audit writes and purge command retention changes - spec 134 design artifacts and focused Pest coverage for audit foundation behavior ## Validation - `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Unit/Audit tests/Unit/Badges/AuditBadgesTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/AuditLogPageTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/AuditLogDetailInspectionTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/AuditLogAuthorizationTest.php tests/Feature/Monitoring/AuditCoverageGovernanceTest.php tests/Feature/Monitoring/AuditCoverageOperationsTest.php tests/Feature/Console/TenantpilotPurgeNonPersistentDataTest.php` ## Notes - Livewire v4.0+ compliance is preserved within the existing Filament v5 application. - No provider registration changes were needed; panel provider registration remains in `bootstrap/providers.php`. - No new globally searchable resource was introduced. - The audit page remains read-only; no destructive actions were added. - No new asset pipeline changes were introduced; existing deploy-time `php artisan filament:assets` behavior remains unchanged. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #163
34 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
34 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Audit Log Foundation
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-11
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](/Users/ahmeddarrazi/Documents/projects/TenantAtlas/specs/134-audit-log-foundation/spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation pass 1: passed. The spec stays product-facing while still naming the existing canonical audit route and capability required by current repo conventions. |