ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
dev
TenantAtlas/specs/137-platform-provider-identity/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido bab01f07a9 feat: standardize platform provider identity (#166) 
## Summary
- standardize Microsoft provider connections around explicit platform vs dedicated identity modes
- centralize admin-consent URL and runtime identity resolution so platform flows no longer fall back to tenant-local credentials
- add migration classification, richer consent and verification state handling, dedicated override management, and focused regression coverage

## Validation
- focused repo test coverage was added across provider identity, onboarding, audit, policy, guard, and migration flows
- latest explicit passing run in the workspace: `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/AdminConsentCallbackTest.php tests/Feature/Audit/ProviderConnectionConsentAuditTest.php`

## Notes
- branch includes the full Spec 137 artifact set under `specs/137-platform-provider-identity/`
- target base branch: `dev`

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #166
2026-03-13 16:29:08 +00:00

1.3 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Platform Provider Identity Standardization

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-13
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation completed in one pass against the repo spec template and constitution-alignment requirements.
  • No clarification markers remain; the feature is ready for /speckit.plan.