ahmido
bab01f07a9
## Summary - standardize Microsoft provider connections around explicit platform vs dedicated identity modes - centralize admin-consent URL and runtime identity resolution so platform flows no longer fall back to tenant-local credentials - add migration classification, richer consent and verification state handling, dedicated override management, and focused regression coverage ## Validation - focused repo test coverage was added across provider identity, onboarding, audit, policy, guard, and migration flows - latest explicit passing run in the workspace: `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/AdminConsentCallbackTest.php tests/Feature/Audit/ProviderConnectionConsentAuditTest.php` ## Notes - branch includes the full Spec 137 artifact set under `specs/137-platform-provider-identity/` - target base branch: `dev` Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #166
35 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Platform Provider Identity Standardization
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-13
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](/Users/ahmeddarrazi/Documents/projects/TenantAtlas/specs/137-platform-provider-identity/spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation completed in one pass against the repo spec template and constitution-alignment requirements.
|
|
- No clarification markers remain; the feature is ready for `/speckit.plan`. |