ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
dev
TenantAtlas/specs/141-shared-diff-presentation-foundation/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 0b5cadc234 feat: add shared diff presentation foundation (#170) 
## Summary
- add a shared diff presentation layer under `app/Support/Diff` with deterministic row classification, summary derivation, and value stringification
- centralize diff-state badge semantics through `BadgeCatalog` with a dedicated `DiffRowStatusBadge`
- add reusable Filament diff partials, focused Pest coverage, and the full SpecKit artifact set for spec 141

## Testing
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Unit/Support/Diff/DiffRowStatusTest.php tests/Unit/Support/Diff/DiffRowTest.php tests/Unit/Support/Diff/DiffPresenterTest.php tests/Unit/Support/Diff/ValueStringifierTest.php tests/Unit/Badges/DiffRowStatusBadgeTest.php tests/Feature/Support/Diff/SharedDiffSummaryPartialTest.php tests/Feature/Support/Diff/SharedDiffRowPartialTest.php tests/Feature/Support/Diff/SharedInlineListDiffPartialTest.php`
- `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`

## Filament / Livewire Contract
- Livewire v4.0+ compliance: unchanged and respected; this feature adds presentation support only within the existing Filament v5 / Livewire v4 stack
- Provider registration: unchanged; no panel/provider changes were required, so `bootstrap/providers.php` remains the correct registration location
- Global search: unchanged; no Resource or global-search behavior was added or modified
- Destructive actions: none introduced in this feature
- Asset strategy: no new registered Filament assets; shared Blade partials rely on the existing asset pipeline and standard deploy step for `php artisan filament:assets` when assets change generally
- Testing coverage: presenter, DTOs, stringifier, badge semantics, summary partial, row partial, and inline-list partial are covered by focused Pest unit and feature tests

## Notes
- Spec checklist status is complete for `specs/141-shared-diff-presentation-foundation/checklists/requirements.md`
- This PR preserves specialized diff renderers and documents incremental adoption rather than forcing migration in the same change

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #170
2026-03-14 12:32:08 +00:00

1.3 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Shared Diff Presentation Foundation

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-14
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation completed in one pass.
  • No clarification questions were required.
  • The feature-specific content stays presentation-focused and bounded to shared diff semantics, incremental adoption, accessibility, and reuse.