ahmido
bb72a54e84
## Summary - remove the dead legacy drift-computation path from `CompareBaselineToTenantJob` so the strategy-driven compare engine is the only execution path left in the orchestration file - tighten compare guard and regression coverage around strategy selection, strategy execution context, findings, gaps, and no-drift outcomes - fix the repo-wide suite blockers uncovered during validation by making the governance taxonomy registry test-double compatible and aligning the capture capability guard test with current unsupported-scope behavior - add the Spec 205 planning artifacts and mark the implementation tasks complete ## Verification - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests --stop-on-failure` - result: `3659 passed, 8 skipped (21016 assertions)` - browser smoke test passed on the Baseline Compare landing surface via the local smoke-login flow ## Notes - no Filament resource, panel, global search, destructive action, or asset registration behavior was changed - provider registration remains unchanged in `apps/platform/bootstrap/providers.php` - the compare path remains strategy-driven and Livewire v4 / Filament v5 assumptions are unchanged Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #235
35 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Compare Job Legacy Drift Path Cleanup
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-14
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation passed on 2026-04-14 after the initial drafting pass.
|
|
- The feature is an internal cleanup, so user value is expressed through architectural honesty, review speed, and regression safety rather than a new operator-facing workflow. |