ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
website-dev
TenantAtlas/specs/235-baseline-capture-truth/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido be314c577f Spec 400: rebuild Tenantial homepage visuals (#387) 
## Summary
- rebuild the public Tenantial homepage around an evidence-first Microsoft tenant governance narrative
- replace the old hero visual with a new static dashboard preview and add dedicated Trust Bar and Feature Pillars sections
- update the shared public shell, navigation, footer, dark design tokens, assets, and homepage content to match the new brand direction
- align website smoke coverage and Spec 400 artifacts with the rebuilt homepage

## Testing
- not run in this pass
- updated website smoke specs under apps/website/tests/smoke

## Note
- `website-dev` was pushed to `origin` so the requested PR base exists remotely
- the remote `website-dev` branch is an ancestor of `origin/dev`, so this PR may also show upstream `dev` history relative to that base

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #387
2026-05-18 14:38:11 +00:00

1.8 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Baseline Capture Truthful Outcomes and Upstream Guardrails

Purpose: Capture specification completeness and quality at planning handoff, while keeping post-plan status notes aligned with the current artifact set
Created: 2026-04-23
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation algorithms, code diffs, or migration steps
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Repo-specific constitutional and surface-contract references remain intentional and bounded
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation algorithms or file-by-file execution steps leak into specification

Notes

  • This checklist records the spec's readiness at planning handoff; plan.md, research.md, data-model.md, quickstart.md, and tasks.md now exist as the implementation-facing artifacts for this feature.
  • Repo-specific constitutional contract references are intentional and bounded; the spec still avoids implementation algorithms, code diffs, migration steps, and file-by-file implementation plans.
  • No clarification markers remain, and the current scope is fully aligned across spec, plan, tasks, and supporting artifacts for implementation.