ahmido
be314c577f
## Summary - rebuild the public Tenantial homepage around an evidence-first Microsoft tenant governance narrative - replace the old hero visual with a new static dashboard preview and add dedicated Trust Bar and Feature Pillars sections - update the shared public shell, navigation, footer, dark design tokens, assets, and homepage content to match the new brand direction - align website smoke coverage and Spec 400 artifacts with the rebuilt homepage ## Testing - not run in this pass - updated website smoke specs under apps/website/tests/smoke ## Note - `website-dev` was pushed to `origin` so the requested PR base exists remotely - the remote `website-dev` branch is an ancestor of `origin/dev`, so this PR may also show upstream `dev` history relative to that base Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #387
37 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
37 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Baseline Capture Truthful Outcomes and Upstream Guardrails
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Capture specification completeness and quality at planning handoff, while keeping post-plan status notes aligned with the current artifact set
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-23
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation algorithms, code diffs, or migration steps
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Repo-specific constitutional and surface-contract references remain intentional and bounded
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation algorithms or file-by-file execution steps leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- This checklist records the spec's readiness at planning handoff; `plan.md`, `research.md`, `data-model.md`, `quickstart.md`, and `tasks.md` now exist as the implementation-facing artifacts for this feature.
|
|
- Repo-specific constitutional contract references are intentional and bounded; the spec still avoids implementation algorithms, code diffs, migration steps, and file-by-file implementation plans.
|
|
- No clarification markers remain, and the current scope is fully aligned across spec, plan, tasks, and supporting artifacts for implementation.
|