ahmido
0b5cadc234
## Summary - add a shared diff presentation layer under `app/Support/Diff` with deterministic row classification, summary derivation, and value stringification - centralize diff-state badge semantics through `BadgeCatalog` with a dedicated `DiffRowStatusBadge` - add reusable Filament diff partials, focused Pest coverage, and the full SpecKit artifact set for spec 141 ## Testing - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Unit/Support/Diff/DiffRowStatusTest.php tests/Unit/Support/Diff/DiffRowTest.php tests/Unit/Support/Diff/DiffPresenterTest.php tests/Unit/Support/Diff/ValueStringifierTest.php tests/Unit/Badges/DiffRowStatusBadgeTest.php tests/Feature/Support/Diff/SharedDiffSummaryPartialTest.php tests/Feature/Support/Diff/SharedDiffRowPartialTest.php tests/Feature/Support/Diff/SharedInlineListDiffPartialTest.php` - `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` ## Filament / Livewire Contract - Livewire v4.0+ compliance: unchanged and respected; this feature adds presentation support only within the existing Filament v5 / Livewire v4 stack - Provider registration: unchanged; no panel/provider changes were required, so `bootstrap/providers.php` remains the correct registration location - Global search: unchanged; no Resource or global-search behavior was added or modified - Destructive actions: none introduced in this feature - Asset strategy: no new registered Filament assets; shared Blade partials rely on the existing asset pipeline and standard deploy step for `php artisan filament:assets` when assets change generally - Testing coverage: presenter, DTOs, stringifier, badge semantics, summary partial, row partial, and inline-list partial are covered by focused Pest unit and feature tests ## Notes - Spec checklist status is complete for `specs/141-shared-diff-presentation-foundation/checklists/requirements.md` - This PR preserves specialized diff renderers and documents incremental adoption rather than forcing migration in the same change Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #170
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Shared Diff Presentation Foundation
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-14
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation completed in one pass.
|
|
- No clarification questions were required.
|
|
- The feature-specific content stays presentation-focused and bounded to shared diff semantics, incremental adoption, accessibility, and reuse. |