ahmido
110245a9ec
Some checks are pending
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Waiting to run
## Summary - add a shared provider target-scope descriptor, normalizer, identity-context metadata, and surface-summary layer - update provider connection list, detail, create, edit, and onboarding surfaces to use neutral target-scope vocabulary while keeping Microsoft identity contextual - align provider connection audit and resolver output with the neutral target-scope contract and add focused guard/unit/feature coverage for regressions ## Validation - browser smoke: opened the tenant-scoped provider connection list, drilled into detail, and verified the edit/create surfaces in local admin context ## Notes - this PR comes from the session branch created for the active feature work - no additional runtime or persistence layer was introduced in this slice Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #274
1.3 KiB
1.3 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Provider Identity & Target Scope Neutrality
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-04-24 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- The spec stays bounded to provider connection identity and target-scope semantics on existing shared surfaces.
- Broader governed-subject and compare-boundary work remains an explicit follow-up, not hidden scope inside this draft.