ahmido
110245a9ec
Some checks are pending
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Waiting to run
## Summary - add a shared provider target-scope descriptor, normalizer, identity-context metadata, and surface-summary layer - update provider connection list, detail, create, edit, and onboarding surfaces to use neutral target-scope vocabulary while keeping Microsoft identity contextual - align provider connection audit and resolver output with the neutral target-scope contract and add focused guard/unit/feature coverage for regressions ## Validation - browser smoke: opened the tenant-scoped provider connection list, drilled into detail, and verified the edit/create surfaces in local admin context ## Notes - this PR comes from the session branch created for the active feature work - no additional runtime or persistence layer was introduced in this slice Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #274
35 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Provider Identity & Target Scope Neutrality
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-24
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- The spec stays bounded to provider connection identity and target-scope semantics on existing shared surfaces.
|
|
- Broader governed-subject and compare-boundary work remains an explicit follow-up, not hidden scope inside this draft. |