ahmido
15b21c3080
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 44s
## Summary - add the full Spec 201 artifact set for enforcement and review guardrails - update the SpecKit workflow surfaces to carry UI/surface guardrail classification, handling modes, proof depth, and close-out targeting - align the operator UX standards reference and agent context with the new guardrail workflow ## Validation - completed cross-artifact consistency analysis for spec, plan, tasks, research, data model, contracts, and quickstart - recorded the low-impact workflow path at `00:48` and the representative guarded review at `02:34` - no Pest or runtime test suite was run because this is a docs/workflow-only feature - integrated browser smoke on the tenant dashboard could not complete because tenant-scoped unauthenticated navigation currently redirects to `/admin/t/login`, which returns `404 Not Found` ## Filament Notes - Livewire v4.0+ compliance is unchanged - provider registration remains in `bootstrap/providers.php` - no globally searchable resources were added or modified - no destructive runtime actions were introduced or changed - no asset strategy changes were made; existing `filament:assets` deployment behavior remains unchanged Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #250
1.6 KiB
1.6 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Enforcement & Review Guardrails
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-18
Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- Validated against the drafted Spec 201 on 2026-04-18 after converting the source outline into the repository template and measurable requirement language.
- Optional operator-surface classification tables are intentionally omitted because this feature governs workflow and review mechanics rather than changing a concrete runtime surface.
- Filament and repository-signal terminology is intentional product vocabulary for this governance slice, not code-level implementation guidance.
- No clarification markers remain. The spec is ready for
/speckit.plan.