ahmido
15b21c3080
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 44s
## Summary - add the full Spec 201 artifact set for enforcement and review guardrails - update the SpecKit workflow surfaces to carry UI/surface guardrail classification, handling modes, proof depth, and close-out targeting - align the operator UX standards reference and agent context with the new guardrail workflow ## Validation - completed cross-artifact consistency analysis for spec, plan, tasks, research, data model, contracts, and quickstart - recorded the low-impact workflow path at `00:48` and the representative guarded review at `02:34` - no Pest or runtime test suite was run because this is a docs/workflow-only feature - integrated browser smoke on the tenant dashboard could not complete because tenant-scoped unauthenticated navigation currently redirects to `/admin/t/login`, which returns `404 Not Found` ## Filament Notes - Livewire v4.0+ compliance is unchanged - provider registration remains in `bootstrap/providers.php` - no globally searchable resources were added or modified - no destructive runtime actions were introduced or changed - no asset strategy changes were made; existing `filament:assets` deployment behavior remains unchanged Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #250
38 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
38 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Enforcement & Review Guardrails
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-18
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validated against the drafted Spec 201 on 2026-04-18 after converting the source outline into the repository template and measurable requirement language.
|
|
- Optional operator-surface classification tables are intentionally omitted because this feature governs workflow and review mechanics rather than changing a concrete runtime surface.
|
|
- Filament and repository-signal terminology is intentional product vocabulary for this governance slice, not code-level implementation guidance.
|
|
- No clarification markers remain. The spec is ready for `/speckit.plan`.
|