ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
28e62bd22c
TenantAtlas/specs/187-portfolio-triage-arrival-context/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 28e62bd22c feat: preserve portfolio triage arrival context (#218) 
## Summary
- preserve portfolio triage arrival context from workspace overview and tenant registry drill-throughs
- add a tenant dashboard continuity widget plus bounded arrival token and resolver support
- add focused Pest coverage for arrival routing, return flow, RBAC degradation, and request-local performance
- include the Spec 187 spec, plan, research, data model, quickstart, contract, and tasks artifacts

## Validation
- integrated browser smoke: workspace overview -> tenant dashboard arrival -> backup sets CTA
- integrated browser smoke: tenant registry triage -> tenant dashboard arrival -> return to tenant triage
- branch includes focused automated test coverage for the new arrival-context surfaces

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #218
2026-04-09 21:38:31 +00:00

1.4 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Portfolio Triage Arrival Context

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-04-09 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation pass completed on 2026-04-09.
  • Route and surface identifiers are included only where the project template requires surface scoping; the behavioral requirements stay focused on operator workflow continuity, truth boundaries, and bounded next actions.
  • The spec introduces no unresolved clarification markers, no new persistence, and no new recovery-truth model.