ahmido
28e62bd22c
## Summary - preserve portfolio triage arrival context from workspace overview and tenant registry drill-throughs - add a tenant dashboard continuity widget plus bounded arrival token and resolver support - add focused Pest coverage for arrival routing, return flow, RBAC degradation, and request-local performance - include the Spec 187 spec, plan, research, data model, quickstart, contract, and tasks artifacts ## Validation - integrated browser smoke: workspace overview -> tenant dashboard arrival -> backup sets CTA - integrated browser smoke: tenant registry triage -> tenant dashboard arrival -> return to tenant triage - branch includes focused automated test coverage for the new arrival-context surfaces Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #218
36 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Portfolio Triage Arrival Context
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-09
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation pass completed on 2026-04-09.
|
|
- Route and surface identifiers are included only where the project template requires surface scoping; the behavioral requirements stay focused on operator workflow continuity, truth boundaries, and bounded next actions.
|
|
- The spec introduces no unresolved clarification markers, no new persistence, and no new recovery-truth model. |