ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
2f45ff5a84
TenantAtlas/specs/189-portfolio-triage-review-state/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 2f45ff5a84 feat: add portfolio triage review state tracking (#220) 
## Summary
- add tenant triage review-state persistence, fingerprinting, resolver logic, service layer, and migration for current affected-set tracking
- surface review-state and affected-set progress across tenant registry, tenant dashboard arrival continuity, and workspace overview
- extend RBAC, audit/badge support, specs, and test coverage for portfolio triage review-state workflows
- suppress expected hidden-page background transport failures in the global unhandled rejection logger while keeping visible-page failures logged

## Validation
- targeted Pest coverage added for tenant registry, workspace overview, arrival context, RBAC authorization, badges, fingerprinting, resolver behavior, and logger asset behavior
- code formatted with `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`

## Notes
- full suite was not re-run in this final step
- branch includes the spec artifacts under `specs/189-portfolio-triage-review-state/`

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #220
2026-04-10 21:35:17 +00:00

1.5 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Portfolio Triage Review State and Operator Progress

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-04-10 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation pass completed on 2026-04-10.
  • Route identifiers, stored-state semantics, and operator surface names are included because the project template and constitution require explicit scope, action-surface, and persistence-truth definitions for operator-facing changes.
  • The spec intentionally adds one lightweight persisted triage-review truth while rejecting formal review packs, notes, assignments, SLAs, and broader workflow-engine behavior.