ahmido
2f45ff5a84
## Summary - add tenant triage review-state persistence, fingerprinting, resolver logic, service layer, and migration for current affected-set tracking - surface review-state and affected-set progress across tenant registry, tenant dashboard arrival continuity, and workspace overview - extend RBAC, audit/badge support, specs, and test coverage for portfolio triage review-state workflows - suppress expected hidden-page background transport failures in the global unhandled rejection logger while keeping visible-page failures logged ## Validation - targeted Pest coverage added for tenant registry, workspace overview, arrival context, RBAC authorization, badges, fingerprinting, resolver behavior, and logger asset behavior - code formatted with `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` ## Notes - full suite was not re-run in this final step - branch includes the spec artifacts under `specs/189-portfolio-triage-review-state/` Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #220
36 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Portfolio Triage Review State and Operator Progress
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-10
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation pass completed on 2026-04-10.
|
|
- Route identifiers, stored-state semantics, and operator surface names are included because the project template and constitution require explicit scope, action-surface, and persistence-truth definitions for operator-facing changes.
|
|
- The spec intentionally adds one lightweight persisted triage-review truth while rejecting formal review packs, notes, assignments, SLAs, and broader workflow-engine behavior. |