Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 45s
## Summary Implements Spec 216 for the public website homepage in `apps/website`. This reworks the homepage into the required narrative flow: - hero with one dominant CTA, one secondary CTA, product-near visual, and bounded trust subclaims - outcome framing section - grouped capability model section - explicit trust block before the final CTA - dated progress teaser backed by changelog entries - final CTA transition to contact It also adds the full spec-kit artifact set for `specs/216-homepage-structure` and updates the smoke suite to prove section order, CTA hierarchy, onward route reachability, and mobile readability. ## Validation - `corepack pnpm build:website` - `cd apps/website && corepack pnpm exec playwright test` ## Notes - Branch: `216-homepage-structure` - Commit: `097f8e70` - Remote branch has been pushed and is ready for review. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #254
1.3 KiB
1.3 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Website Homepage Structure & Section Model
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-19
Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- Validation pass 1 completed successfully.
- No clarification questions were required because scope, required sections, routing, and exclusions were explicitly defined in the input.