Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 45s
## Summary Implements Spec 216 for the public website homepage in `apps/website`. This reworks the homepage into the required narrative flow: - hero with one dominant CTA, one secondary CTA, product-near visual, and bounded trust subclaims - outcome framing section - grouped capability model section - explicit trust block before the final CTA - dated progress teaser backed by changelog entries - final CTA transition to contact It also adds the full spec-kit artifact set for `specs/216-homepage-structure` and updates the smoke suite to prove section order, CTA hierarchy, onward route reachability, and mobile readability. ## Validation - `corepack pnpm build:website` - `cd apps/website && corepack pnpm exec playwright test` ## Notes - Branch: `216-homepage-structure` - Commit: `097f8e70` - Remote branch has been pushed and is ready for review. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #254
35 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Website Homepage Structure & Section Model
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-19
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation pass 1 completed successfully.
|
|
- No clarification questions were required because scope, required sections, routing, and exclusions were explicitly defined in the input. |