Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 48s
## Summary - implement the finding outcome taxonomy end-to-end with canonical resolve, close, reopen, and verification semantics - align finding UI, filters, audit metadata, review summaries, and export/read-model consumers to the shared outcome semantics - add focused Pest coverage and complete the spec artifacts for feature 231 ## Details - manual resolve is limited to the canonical `remediated` outcome - close and reopen flows now use bounded canonical reasons - trusted system clear and reopen distinguish verified-clear from verification-failed and recurrence paths - duplicate lifecycle backfill now closes findings canonically as `duplicate` - accepted-risk recording now uses the canonical `accepted_risk` reason - finding detail and list surfaces now expose terminal outcome and verification summaries - review, snapshot, and review-pack consumers now propagate the same outcome buckets ## Filament / Platform Contract - Livewire v4.0+ compatibility remains intact - provider registration is unchanged and remains in `bootstrap/providers.php` - no new globally searchable resource was introduced; `FindingResource` still has a View page and `TenantReviewResource` remains globally searchable false - lifecycle mutations still run through confirmed Filament actions with capability enforcement - no new asset family was added; the existing `filament:assets` deploy step is unchanged ## Verification - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Findings/FindingWorkflowServiceTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingRecurrenceTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingsListFiltersTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/FindingResolvedReferencePresentationTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingOutcomeSummaryReportingTest.php tests/Feature/Findings/FindingRiskGovernanceProjectionTest.php` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Findings tests/Feature/Filament/FindingResolvedReferencePresentationTest.php tests/Feature/Models/FindingResolvedTest.php tests/Unit/Findings/FindingWorkflowServiceTest.php` - `cd apps/platform && ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/TenantReview/TenantReviewExplanationSurfaceTest.php tests/Feature/TenantReview/TenantReviewRegisterTest.php tests/Feature/ReviewPack/TenantReviewDerivedReviewPackTest.php` - browser smoke: `/admin/findings/my-work` -> finding detail resolve flow -> queue regression check passed ## Notes - this commit also includes the existing `.github/agents/copilot-instructions.md` workspace change that was already present in the worktree when all changes were committed Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #267
36 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Finding Outcome Taxonomy & Verification Semantics
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-22
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validated in one pass. No open clarification markers remain.
|
|
- The spec keeps the existing findings lifecycle and scopes the change to one bounded outcome taxonomy plus verification semantics; no new queue, entity, or status family is introduced.
|
|
- Repo-required constitution and surface-guardrail references are treated as product governance constraints, not implementation design leakage. |