ahmido
44898a98ac
## Summary - harden governance artifact truth propagation so stale or partial evidence downgrades evidence snapshots, tenant reviews, review packs, the canonical evidence overview, and the canonical review register consistently - add the full Spec 174 artifact set under `specs/174-evidence-freshness-publication-trust/` including spec, plan, research, data model, contracts, quickstart, checklist, and completed tasks - add focused fixture helpers plus a new browser smoke test for the touched evidence, review, and review-pack trust surfaces ## Testing - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Evidence/EvidenceSnapshotResourceTest.php tests/Feature/Evidence/EvidenceOverviewPageTest.php tests/Feature/TenantReview/TenantReviewLifecycleTest.php tests/Feature/TenantReview/TenantReviewRegisterTest.php tests/Feature/ReviewPack/ReviewPackResourceTest.php tests/Feature/Monitoring/ArtifactTruthRunDetailTest.php tests/Browser/Spec174EvidenceFreshnessPublicationTrustSmokeTest.php` - manual integrated-browser smoke pass across Evidence Overview, Review Register, tenant review detail, tenant evidence snapshot detail, and review-packs list ## Notes - Livewire v4 compliance is preserved and no Filament v3/v4 APIs were introduced - no panel or provider changes were made; Laravel 11+ provider registration remains in `bootstrap/providers.php` - no new global-search behavior was introduced; existing resource view pages remain the relevant detail endpoints - destructive actions were not broadened; existing confirmation and authorization behavior remains in place - no new assets were added, so the current Filament asset strategy and deploy-time `php artisan filament:assets` behavior stay unchanged - branch `174-evidence-freshness-publication-trust` is pushed at `7f2c82c26dc83bbc09fbf9e732d5644cdd143113` and targets `dev` Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #205
1.4 KiB
1.4 KiB
Specification Quality Checklist: Evidence Temporal Freshness & Review Publication Trust
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-04-04
Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- Focused on user value and business needs
- Written for non-technical stakeholders
- All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- Success criteria are measurable
- Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- All acceptance scenarios are defined
- Edge cases are identified
- Scope is clearly bounded
- Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- User scenarios cover primary flows
- Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- Required repo contract references such as routes, capabilities, and affected operator surfaces are included because this repository's spec format requires them; the requirements and outcomes themselves remain user-facing and do not prescribe code structure.
- No clarification markers remain. The feature is ready for
/speckit.plan.