ahmido
44898a98ac
## Summary - harden governance artifact truth propagation so stale or partial evidence downgrades evidence snapshots, tenant reviews, review packs, the canonical evidence overview, and the canonical review register consistently - add the full Spec 174 artifact set under `specs/174-evidence-freshness-publication-trust/` including spec, plan, research, data model, contracts, quickstart, checklist, and completed tasks - add focused fixture helpers plus a new browser smoke test for the touched evidence, review, and review-pack trust surfaces ## Testing - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Evidence/EvidenceSnapshotResourceTest.php tests/Feature/Evidence/EvidenceOverviewPageTest.php tests/Feature/TenantReview/TenantReviewLifecycleTest.php tests/Feature/TenantReview/TenantReviewRegisterTest.php tests/Feature/ReviewPack/ReviewPackResourceTest.php tests/Feature/Monitoring/ArtifactTruthRunDetailTest.php tests/Browser/Spec174EvidenceFreshnessPublicationTrustSmokeTest.php` - manual integrated-browser smoke pass across Evidence Overview, Review Register, tenant review detail, tenant evidence snapshot detail, and review-packs list ## Notes - Livewire v4 compliance is preserved and no Filament v3/v4 APIs were introduced - no panel or provider changes were made; Laravel 11+ provider registration remains in `bootstrap/providers.php` - no new global-search behavior was introduced; existing resource view pages remain the relevant detail endpoints - destructive actions were not broadened; existing confirmation and authorization behavior remains in place - no new assets were added, so the current Filament asset strategy and deploy-time `php artisan filament:assets` behavior stay unchanged - branch `174-evidence-freshness-publication-trust` is pushed at `7f2c82c26dc83bbc09fbf9e732d5644cdd143113` and targets `dev` Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #205
35 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Evidence Temporal Freshness & Review Publication Trust
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-04
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Required repo contract references such as routes, capabilities, and affected operator surfaces are included because this repository's spec format requires them; the requirements and outcomes themselves remain user-facing and do not prescribe code structure.
|
|
- No clarification markers remain. The feature is ready for `/speckit.plan`. |