ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
548a37c888
TenantAtlas/specs/349-customer-review-workspace-output-resolution-guidance/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 9b46c0e435 feat: customer review workspace output resolution guidance (spec 349) (#420) 
Implemented the output resolution guidance for the customer review workspace and internal views. Added ReviewPackOutputResolutionGuidance, updated CustomerReviewWorkspace and EnvironmentReviewResource, and added related blade views and tests.

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #420
2026-06-03 01:35:55 +00:00

2.8 KiB
Raw Blame History

Requirements Checklist: Spec 349 - Customer Review Workspace Output Resolution Guidance

Purpose: Validate that Spec 349 is bounded, repo-based, constitution-aligned, and ready for later implementation.
Created: 2026-06-03
Feature: specs/349-customer-review-workspace-output-resolution-guidance/spec.md

Candidate Selection And Scope

  • CHK001 The package names the direct user-provided candidate source and its roadmap alignment with Customer Review Workspace v1 completion.
  • CHK002 Completed adjacent specs are treated as historical context only and are not reopened or normalized.
  • CHK003 The scope is narrowed to output-guidance productization over existing readiness truth, workspace, and review detail surfaces only.
  • CHK004 Explicit non-goals block a workflow engine, persistence, portal, renderer, and broad surface redesign.

Repo Truth And Architecture

  • CHK005 The spec and plan anchor the work to the existing ReviewPackOutputReadiness truth and current scoped routes.
  • CHK006 The artifacts state that any new guidance state remains derived-only and not a persisted domain state.
  • CHK007 The plan avoids inventing a new route family, hidden shell context, or second raw-readiness dialect.
  • CHK008 The user-draft conflict around ui-009-review-pack-output-contract.md is corrected explicitly in the spec and repo-truth map.

UI/Productization Coverage

  • CHK009 UI Surface Impact is explicit and consistent with the intended workspace/detail changes.
  • CHK010 UI/Productization Coverage identifies the existing strategic workspace page report and avoids inventing new route/archetype coverage unnecessarily.
  • CHK011 The spec requires one dominant output state and one dominant next action rather than many equal-weight warnings.
  • CHK012 Audience-aware disclosure keeps technical details secondary and customer-safe wording conservative.

Testing And Validation

  • CHK013 Planned tests cover workspace guidance, review-pack resolution mapping, detail-surface separation, and one bounded browser smoke.
  • CHK014 The validation commands explicitly rerun Spec 347 regressions plus filtered workspace/review-pack coverage.
  • CHK015 The artifacts name pint --dirty and git diff --check as final prep-aligned validation steps.

Review Outcome

  • CHK016 Review outcome class: acceptable-special-case
  • CHK017 Workflow outcome: keep
  • CHK018 Final note location is the active feature PR close-out entry Guardrail / Smoke Coverage.

Notes

  • This checklist validates preparation readiness only. No application implementation has been performed.
  • The remaining implementation choice is intentionally narrow: extend ReviewPackOutputReadiness directly or wrap it with one bounded guidance adapter.