ahmido
9b46c0e435
Implemented the output resolution guidance for the customer review workspace and internal views. Added ReviewPackOutputResolutionGuidance, updated CustomerReviewWorkspace and EnvironmentReviewResource, and added related blade views and tests. Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #420
44 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
44 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
# Requirements Checklist: Spec 349 - Customer Review Workspace Output Resolution Guidance
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate that Spec 349 is bounded, repo-based, constitution-aligned, and ready for later implementation.
|
|
**Created**: 2026-06-03
|
|
**Feature**: `specs/349-customer-review-workspace-output-resolution-guidance/spec.md`
|
|
|
|
## Candidate Selection And Scope
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK001 The package names the direct user-provided candidate source and its roadmap alignment with Customer Review Workspace v1 completion.
|
|
- [x] CHK002 Completed adjacent specs are treated as historical context only and are not reopened or normalized.
|
|
- [x] CHK003 The scope is narrowed to output-guidance productization over existing readiness truth, workspace, and review detail surfaces only.
|
|
- [x] CHK004 Explicit non-goals block a workflow engine, persistence, portal, renderer, and broad surface redesign.
|
|
|
|
## Repo Truth And Architecture
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK005 The spec and plan anchor the work to the existing `ReviewPackOutputReadiness` truth and current scoped routes.
|
|
- [x] CHK006 The artifacts state that any new guidance state remains derived-only and not a persisted domain state.
|
|
- [x] CHK007 The plan avoids inventing a new route family, hidden shell context, or second raw-readiness dialect.
|
|
- [x] CHK008 The user-draft conflict around `ui-009-review-pack-output-contract.md` is corrected explicitly in the spec and repo-truth map.
|
|
|
|
## UI/Productization Coverage
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK009 UI Surface Impact is explicit and consistent with the intended workspace/detail changes.
|
|
- [x] CHK010 UI/Productization Coverage identifies the existing strategic workspace page report and avoids inventing new route/archetype coverage unnecessarily.
|
|
- [x] CHK011 The spec requires one dominant output state and one dominant next action rather than many equal-weight warnings.
|
|
- [x] CHK012 Audience-aware disclosure keeps technical details secondary and customer-safe wording conservative.
|
|
|
|
## Testing And Validation
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK013 Planned tests cover workspace guidance, review-pack resolution mapping, detail-surface separation, and one bounded browser smoke.
|
|
- [x] CHK014 The validation commands explicitly rerun Spec 347 regressions plus filtered workspace/review-pack coverage.
|
|
- [x] CHK015 The artifacts name `pint --dirty` and `git diff --check` as final prep-aligned validation steps.
|
|
|
|
## Review Outcome
|
|
|
|
- [x] CHK016 Review outcome class: `acceptable-special-case`
|
|
- [x] CHK017 Workflow outcome: `keep`
|
|
- [x] CHK018 Final note location is the active feature PR close-out entry `Guardrail / Smoke Coverage`.
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- This checklist validates preparation readiness only. No application implementation has been performed.
|
|
- The remaining implementation choice is intentionally narrow: extend `ReviewPackOutputReadiness` directly or wrap it with one bounded guidance adapter.
|