TenantAtlas/specs/159-baseline-snapshot-truth/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 8426741068 feat: add baseline snapshot truth guards (#189)
## Summary
- add explicit BaselineSnapshot lifecycle truth with conservative backfill and a shared truth resolver
- block baseline compare from building, incomplete, or superseded snapshots and align workspace/tenant UI truth surfaces with effective snapshot state
- surface artifact truth separately from operation outcome across baseline profile, snapshot, compare, and operation run pages

## Testing
- integrated browser smoke test on the active feature surfaces
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineSnapshotTruthSurfaceTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineProfileCompareStartSurfaceTest.php`
- targeted baseline lifecycle and compare guard coverage added in Pest
- `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent`

## Notes
- Livewire v4 compliance preserved
- no panel provider registration changes were needed; Laravel 12 providers remain in `bootstrap/providers.php`
- global search remains disabled for the affected baseline resources by design
- destructive actions remain confirmation-gated; capture and compare actions keep their existing authorization and confirmation behavior
- no new panel assets were added; existing deploy flow for `filament:assets` is unchanged

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #189
2026-03-23 11:32:00 +00:00

1.4 KiB

Specification Quality Checklist: Artifact Truth & Downstream Consumption Guards for BaselineSnapshot

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-03-23 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation pass completed after drafting the initial specification.
  • The spec keeps implementation choices open for the persistence strategy while making lifecycle, consumability, and downstream guard behavior explicit.