ahmido
8426741068
## Summary - add explicit BaselineSnapshot lifecycle truth with conservative backfill and a shared truth resolver - block baseline compare from building, incomplete, or superseded snapshots and align workspace/tenant UI truth surfaces with effective snapshot state - surface artifact truth separately from operation outcome across baseline profile, snapshot, compare, and operation run pages ## Testing - integrated browser smoke test on the active feature surfaces - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineSnapshotTruthSurfaceTest.php tests/Feature/Filament/BaselineProfileCompareStartSurfaceTest.php` - targeted baseline lifecycle and compare guard coverage added in Pest - `vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent` ## Notes - Livewire v4 compliance preserved - no panel provider registration changes were needed; Laravel 12 providers remain in `bootstrap/providers.php` - global search remains disabled for the affected baseline resources by design - destructive actions remain confirmation-gated; capture and compare actions keep their existing authorization and confirmation behavior - no new panel assets were added; existing deploy flow for `filament:assets` is unchanged Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #189
35 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Artifact Truth & Downstream Consumption Guards for BaselineSnapshot
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-23
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](/Users/ahmeddarrazi/Documents/projects/TenantAtlas/specs/159-baseline-snapshot-truth/spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation pass completed after drafting the initial specification.
|
|
- The spec keeps implementation choices open for the persistence strategy while making lifecycle, consumability, and downstream guard behavior explicit. |