TenantAtlas/specs/248-private-ai-policy-foundation/checklists/requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Private AI Execution & Policy Foundation

Purpose: Validate full preparation-package completeness and implementation readiness before the feature moves into the implementation loop
Created: 2026-04-27
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

• Business value and operator outcomes stay explicit
• The first slice is bounded to one governed decision boundary, two approved internal-only use cases, one workspace AI policy section, and one reused operational control
• Runtime-governance sections are present for an implementation-ready package, not treated as docs-only
• All mandatory sections are completed

Requirement Completeness

• No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
• Requirements are testable and unambiguous
• Acceptance scenarios are defined for workspace policy, governed allow-or-block decisions, and central pause/resume handling
• Edge cases are identified, including missing workspace context, unregistered use cases, blocked data classes, and active ai.execution control
• Scope is clearly bounded away from customer-facing AI, external public-provider execution, queue or OperationRun work, and prompt or result persistence
• Dependencies, assumptions, risks, and follow-up candidates are identified

Feature Readiness

• The first slice is small enough for a bounded implementation loop
• Concrete repo surfaces are named for workspace settings, system ops controls, audit reuse, and the new in-process AI support namespace
• Foundational work stays preparation-only and does not imply model runtime, customer UI, or a new AI table or result store
• The tasks are ordered, testable, and grouped by user story
• No unresolved product question blocks /speckit.implement once artifact analysis passes

Governance Readiness

• Workspace-owned AI policy truth is explicitly kept in existing settings persistence with no new AI table or result ledger
• The approved-use-case catalog remains locked to two internal-only consumers and keeps provider vocabulary vendor-neutral
• The package explicitly forbids customer-facing AI, external public-provider execution, and queue or OperationRun semantics in v1
• Existing workspace and platform authorization paths remain authoritative, with confirmation-protected Pause AI execution and Resume AI execution as the only destructive-like mutations in scope
• Livewire v4 and Filament v5 compliance, unchanged provider registration in bootstrap/providers.php, no new global-search resource, and no asset-strategy changes are explicit in the package

Test Governance Review

• Lane fit stays in focused unit plus feature validation with one architecture guard only
• Fixture and helper growth stays local to AI support, workspace settings, operational controls, and guard coverage
• No browser, heavy-governance, queue, or provider-emulator family is introduced implicitly
• Minimal validation commands are explicit in the plan and quickstart
• The active feature PR close-out entry remains Guardrail

Review Outcome

• Review outcome class: keep
• Workflow outcome: keep
• Next command readiness: /speckit.implement after artifact analysis is clear

Notes

• This checklist validates the preparation package only: spec.md, plan.md, supporting artifacts, and tasks.md. It does not claim that application code or an AI execution runtime already exists.
• The active slice stops before customer-facing AI, external-public provider execution, queue or OperationRun orchestration, prompt or result persistence, and any broader provider marketplace or budgeting work.
• Provider registration remains unchanged in bootstrap/providers.php, no new global-search resource is introduced, and no new asset strategy is needed for this package.