TenantAtlas/specs/161-operator-explanation-layer/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 1f0cc5de56 feat: implement operator explanation layer (#191)
## Summary
- add the shared operator explanation layer with explanation families, trustworthiness semantics, count descriptors, and centralized badge mappings
- adopt explanation-first rendering across baseline compare, governance operation run detail, baseline snapshot presentation, tenant review detail, and review register rows
- extend reason translation, artifact-truth presentation, fallback ops UX messaging, and focused regression coverage for operator explanation semantics

## Testing
- vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent
- vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Monitoring/OperationsTenantScopeTest.php tests/Feature/Operations/OperationRunBlockedExecutionPresentationTest.php
- vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact

## Notes
- Livewire v4 compatible
- panel provider registration remains in bootstrap/providers.php
- no destructive Filament actions were added or changed in this PR
- no new global-search behavior was introduced in this slice

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #191
2026-03-24 11:24:33 +00:00

1.5 KiB

Specification Quality Checklist: Operator Explanation Layer for Degraded, Partial, and Suppressed Results

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-23
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validated on 2026-03-23 after first-pass authoring.
  • Spec numbering was corrected manually to 161-operator-explanation-layer after the initial scaffold was created with 001.
  • Scope is intentionally bounded to the shared explanation layer and its reference adoption surfaces, not a full governance-surface redesign.