ahmido
1f0cc5de56
## Summary - add the shared operator explanation layer with explanation families, trustworthiness semantics, count descriptors, and centralized badge mappings - adopt explanation-first rendering across baseline compare, governance operation run detail, baseline snapshot presentation, tenant review detail, and review register rows - extend reason translation, artifact-truth presentation, fallback ops UX messaging, and focused regression coverage for operator explanation semantics ## Testing - vendor/bin/sail bin pint --dirty --format agent - vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact tests/Feature/Monitoring/OperationsTenantScopeTest.php tests/Feature/Operations/OperationRunBlockedExecutionPresentationTest.php - vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact ## Notes - Livewire v4 compatible - panel provider registration remains in bootstrap/providers.php - no destructive Filament actions were added or changed in this PR - no new global-search behavior was introduced in this slice Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #191
36 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Operator Explanation Layer for Degraded, Partial, and Suppressed Results
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-23
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](/Users/ahmeddarrazi/Documents/projects/TenantAtlas/specs/161-operator-explanation-layer/spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validated on 2026-03-23 after first-pass authoring.
|
|
- Spec numbering was corrected manually to `161-operator-explanation-layer` after the initial scaffold was created with `001`.
|
|
- Scope is intentionally bounded to the shared explanation layer and its reference adoption surfaces, not a full governance-surface redesign. |