ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
807d574d31
TenantAtlas/specs/168-tenant-governance-aggregate-contract/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 807d574d31 feat: add tenant governance aggregate contract and action surface follow-ups (#199) 
## Summary
- amend the operator UI constitution and related SpecKit templates for the new UI/UX governance rules
- add Spec 168 artifacts plus the tenant governance aggregate implementation used by the tenant dashboard, banner, and baseline compare landing surfaces
- normalize Filament action surfaces around clickable-row inspection, grouped secondary actions, and explicit action-surface declarations across enrolled resources and pages
- fix post-suite regressions in membership cache priming, finding workflow state refresh, tenant review derived-state invalidation, and tenant-bound backup-set related navigation

## Commit Series
- `docs: amend operator UI constitution`
- `spec: add tenant governance aggregate contract`
- `feat: add tenant governance aggregate contract`
- `refactor: normalize filament action surfaces`
- `fix: resolve post-suite state regressions`

## Testing
- `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact`
- Result: `3176 passed, 8 skipped (17384 assertions)`

## Notes
- Livewire v4 / Filament v5 stack remains unchanged
- no provider registration changes; `bootstrap/providers.php` remains the relevant location
- no new global-search resources or asset-registration changes in this branch

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #199
2026-03-29 21:14:17 +00:00

1.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Tenant Governance Aggregate Contract

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
Created: 2026-03-28
Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation passed on first draft. The spec introduces one narrow derived aggregate contract, explicitly avoids new persistence and new state families, and keeps the work bounded to existing tenant-governance summary surfaces.