ahmido
807d574d31
## Summary - amend the operator UI constitution and related SpecKit templates for the new UI/UX governance rules - add Spec 168 artifacts plus the tenant governance aggregate implementation used by the tenant dashboard, banner, and baseline compare landing surfaces - normalize Filament action surfaces around clickable-row inspection, grouped secondary actions, and explicit action-surface declarations across enrolled resources and pages - fix post-suite regressions in membership cache priming, finding workflow state refresh, tenant review derived-state invalidation, and tenant-bound backup-set related navigation ## Commit Series - `docs: amend operator UI constitution` - `spec: add tenant governance aggregate contract` - `feat: add tenant governance aggregate contract` - `refactor: normalize filament action surfaces` - `fix: resolve post-suite state regressions` ## Testing - `vendor/bin/sail artisan test --compact` - Result: `3176 passed, 8 skipped (17384 assertions)` ## Notes - Livewire v4 / Filament v5 stack remains unchanged - no provider registration changes; `bootstrap/providers.php` remains the relevant location - no new global-search resources or asset-registration changes in this branch Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #199
34 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
34 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Tenant Governance Aggregate Contract
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-03-28
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation passed on first draft. The spec introduces one narrow derived aggregate contract, explicitly avoids new persistence and new state families, and keeps the work bounded to existing tenant-governance summary surfaces. |