ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
81a07a41e4
TenantAtlas/specs/211-runtime-trend-recalibration/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 81a07a41e4
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 46s
Details
feat: implement runtime trend recalibration reporting (#244) 
## Summary
- implement Spec 211 runtime trend reporting with bounded lane history, drift classification, hotspot trend output, and recalibration evidence handling
- extend the repo-truth governance seams and workflow wrappers for comparable-bundle hydration, trend artifact publication, and contract-backed reporting
- add the Spec 211 planning artifacts, data model, quickstart, tasks, and repository contract documents

## Validation
- parsed `specs/211-runtime-trend-recalibration/contracts/test-runtime-trend-history.schema.json`
- parsed `specs/211-runtime-trend-recalibration/contracts/test-runtime-trend.logical.openapi.yaml`
- re-ran cross-artifact consistency analysis for the Spec 211 artifact set until no material findings remained
- no application test suite was re-run as part of this final commit/push/PR step

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de>
Reviewed-on: #244
2026-04-18 07:36:05 +00:00

1.8 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Test Runtime Trend Reporting & Baseline Recalibration

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-04-17 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Validation run: 2026-04-17
  • No template placeholders or [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.
  • The spec stays repository-governance-focused: it defines trend visibility, drift semantics, recalibration policy, and contributor behavior without prescribing language-, framework-, or API-level implementation.
  • Repository-specific nouns such as lane, baseline, budget, hotspot, and summary are treated as domain requirements for the test-governance contract rather than low-level implementation detail.
  • The scope remains intentionally narrow: it extends the governed lane system from Specs 206 through 210 with historical observability instead of inventing a broader analytics platform.
  • Items marked incomplete require spec updates before /speckit.clarify or /speckit.plan.