ahmido
81a07a41e4
Some checks failed
Main Confidence / confidence (push) Failing after 46s
## Summary - implement Spec 211 runtime trend reporting with bounded lane history, drift classification, hotspot trend output, and recalibration evidence handling - extend the repo-truth governance seams and workflow wrappers for comparable-bundle hydration, trend artifact publication, and contract-backed reporting - add the Spec 211 planning artifacts, data model, quickstart, tasks, and repository contract documents ## Validation - parsed `specs/211-runtime-trend-recalibration/contracts/test-runtime-trend-history.schema.json` - parsed `specs/211-runtime-trend-recalibration/contracts/test-runtime-trend.logical.openapi.yaml` - re-ran cross-artifact consistency analysis for the Spec 211 artifact set until no material findings remained - no application test suite was re-run as part of this final commit/push/PR step Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmed.darrazi@live.de> Reviewed-on: #244
39 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
39 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: Test Runtime Trend Reporting & Baseline Recalibration
|
|
|
|
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
|
**Created**: 2026-04-17
|
|
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
|
|
|
|
## Content Quality
|
|
|
|
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
## Requirement Completeness
|
|
|
|
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
|
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
|
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
|
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
## Feature Readiness
|
|
|
|
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
|
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
|
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
|
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- Validation run: 2026-04-17
|
|
- No template placeholders or [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.
|
|
- The spec stays repository-governance-focused: it defines trend visibility, drift semantics, recalibration policy, and contributor behavior without prescribing language-, framework-, or API-level implementation.
|
|
- Repository-specific nouns such as lane, baseline, budget, hotspot, and summary are treated as domain requirements for the test-governance contract rather than low-level implementation detail.
|
|
- The scope remains intentionally narrow: it extends the governed lane system from Specs 206 through 210 with historical observability instead of inventing a broader analytics platform.
|
|
- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`. |