TenantAtlas/specs/259-compliance-evidence-mapping/checklists/requirements.md

Preparation Review Checklist: Compliance Evidence Mapping v1

Purpose: Validate repo-fit preparation quality after spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md are complete
Reviewed: 2026-04-30
Feature: spec.md
Supporting artifacts: plan.md, research.md, data-model.md, quickstart.md, tasks.md, compliance-evidence-mapping.openapi.yaml
Related standards: List Surface Review Checklist

Candidate Fit

• The selected candidate still matches the active Compliance Evidence Mapping v1 entry in docs/product/spec-candidates.md, the sequencing in docs/product/roadmap.md, and the moat blocker wording in docs/product/implementation-ledger.md
• Existing specs/ coverage was checked so this package stays a new follow-up rather than duplicating Specs 249 through 258
• The scope stays on one bounded interpretation overlay over existing canonical-control and review truth instead of reopening control foundations or packaging work
• Governance-as-a-Service Packaging and framework-specific overlays are explicitly deferred rather than hidden inside this slice

Constitution Fit

• The package stays on the existing Filament v5 plus Livewire v4 admin plane and does not introduce panel or provider-registration work beyond the current bootstrap/providers.php truth
• No new persistence table, no new report engine, no OperationRun workflow, no portal shell, and no destructive action surface are introduced
• Workspace and tenant isolation remain explicit, including 404 for non-members and out-of-scope tenant targets and capability gating only on reused secondary evidence paths
• One dominant safe action per changed surface is explicitly described, with workspace list and detail disclosure roles remaining consistent across spec, plan, and tasks
• Global-search safety is preserved without introducing a new searchable resource or widening review/evidence discovery across tenant boundaries
• Asset strategy remains unchanged; if later implementation unexpectedly registers assets, deployment still uses the existing cd apps/platform && php artisan filament:assets step

Surface Guardrails

• The package references and satisfies the repo's List Surface Review Checklist for the customer review workspace list surface
• The customer review workspace remains the primary decision surface with one dominant Open released review path and no competing list-row proof action
• The released-review detail surface remains explanation-first, read-only in customer-workspace mode, and keeps supporting evidence as explicit in-body drilldown
• No page-local control taxonomy, framework naming, or second interpretation path is introduced across the changed surfaces

Artifact Consistency

• spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, data-model.md, and the conceptual contract all target the same shared control_interpretation contract and the same workspace plus released-review detail flow
• The primary released-review detail route now follows the same 404 posture described in the spec, with explicit 403 handling reserved only for gated secondary evidence routes
• The workspace contract now models only entitled tenants with a released review, while the no-released-review case remains a page-level empty state instead of a parallel row model
• The required prep artifact checklists/requirements.md exists and includes explicit review outcome and workflow outcome fields
• The required .specify/scripts/bash/update-agent-context.sh copilot step is recorded as completed during planning

Test Governance

• Validation lanes remain explicitly bounded to confidence plus one existing browser smoke
• The package reuses existing TenantReview, CustomerReviewWorkspace, and evidence proof test families instead of creating a new heavy-governance or browser family
• Reviewer proof commands remain explicit and minimal for the touched workspace, detail, evidence, and audit surfaces
• The package includes explicit close-out handling for global-search safety, shared-interpretation-path consistency, and audit-metadata reuse

Notes

• Reviewed after spec.md, plan.md, research.md, data-model.md, quickstart.md, tasks.md, and the conceptual contract were aligned on 2026-04-30.
• This repository's preparation artifacts are intentionally implementation-oriented, so concrete routes, classes, list-surface standards, and validation commands are expected rather than treated as leakage.
• Implementation completed on 2026-04-30. The implementation keeps one shared control_interpretation contract, reuses existing audit events, preserves global-search disablement, and keeps the customer review workspace list surface released-review-only with one dominant inspect action.

Review Outcome

• Outcome class: acceptable-special-case
• Outcome: keep
• Reason: The package keeps the new semantic layer bounded to one versioned interpretation overlay, records the list-surface guardrail expectations, aligns primary-route access semantics to the repo's 404 posture, and removes the extra no-review row branch so the implementation target stays narrow.
• Workflow result: Implemented and validated after the Spec Kit implementation loop.

Implementation Review Outcome

• Guardrail / Smoke Coverage: PASS. Focused feature/browser tests and adjacent contract tests passed; Pint passed.
• Shared interpretation path: PASS. Composition writes one stored v1 interpretation; workspace and detail read it.
• Audit metadata reuse: PASS. Existing events carry source_surface, review_id where applicable, tenant_filter_id, and interpretation_version; no new event family was introduced.
• Global-search safety: PASS. Tenant review, review pack, and evidence resources remain globally disabled.
• Residual risks: none confirmed in scope after the implementation loop.