ahmido/TenantAtlas
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity
971105daa9
TenantAtlas/specs/057-filament-v5-upgrade/checklists/requirements.md
ahmido 971105daa9 057-filament-v5-upgrade (#66) 
Summary: Upgrade Filament to v5 (Livewire v4), replace Filament v4-only plugins, add first-party JSON renderer, and harden Monitoring/Ops UX guardrails.
What I changed:
Composer: upgraded filament/filament → v5, removed pepperfm/filament-json and lara-zeus/torch-filament, added torchlight/engine.
Views: replaced JSON viewer with json-viewer.blade.php and updated snapshot display.
Tests: added DB-only + tenant-isolation guard tests under Monitoring and OpsUx, plus Filament smoke tests.
Specs: added/updated specs/057-filament-v5-upgrade/* (spec, tasks, plan, quickstart, research).
Formatting: ran Pint; ran full test suite (641 passed, 5 skipped).
Validation:
Ran ./vendor/bin/sail artisan test (full suite) — all tests passed.
Ran ./vendor/bin/sail pint --dirty — formatting applied.
Ran npm run build locally (Vite) — assets generated.
Notes / Rollback:
Rollback: revert composer.json/composer.lock and build assets; documented in quickstart.md.
One pending app migration was noted during validation; ensure migrations are applied in staging before deploy.
Reviewers: @frontend, @backend (adjust as needed)
Spec links:
spec.md
tasks.md
quickstart.md

Co-authored-by: Ahmed Darrazi <ahmeddarrazi@adsmac.local>
Reviewed-on: #66
2026-01-20 21:19:27 +00:00

1.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Admin UI Stack Upgrade (Panel + Suite)

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-01-20 Feature: specs/057-filament-v5-upgrade/spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • This is a technical upgrade, but the spec intentionally describes outcomes and guardrails rather than implementation steps.
  • Proceed to planning: identify concrete packages, versions, and migration steps in plan/tasks.